Some critics allege that Jorjandi has received “financial appeasement” from individuals, opposition groups, or media outlets in exchange for removing or retracting content after accusing certain individuals or entities.
It is also rumored that Jorjandi has generated income through financial support from overseas opposition groups (including BBC Persian and VOA), with cash contributions allegedly diversifying their revenue streams.
Controversial Actions and Audience Reactions
Content such as short Telegram videos has pointed to accusations of “extortion” or pressuring subjects into silence.
Users in comments and pod-casts have occasionally criticized Jorjandi’s media approach, suggesting it is more commercialized and media-driven than a genuine pursuit of whistle-blowing.
Conclusion
While unproven, the rumors surrounding Jargandi’s profiteering from revelations raise serious questions about their motives and financial transparency. Be sure to read more details about Jorjandi’s alleged extortion activities.
